<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter: Sifting the Wheat from the Chaff?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thingspharma.mindgen.org/2009/12/22/twitter-sifting-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thingspharma.mindgen.org/2009/12/22/twitter-sifting-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/</link>
	<description>Where Pharma is Going (TM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:13:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Charbonneau</title>
		<link>http://thingspharma.mindgen.org/2009/12/22/twitter-sifting-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Charbonneau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thingspharma.mindgen.org/?p=662#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Twitterer,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the comment.  However, it would seem that this website simply confirms some of the difficulties I mentioned in my post.  If you take a look at the category of &quot;pharmaceuticals,&quot; you will find that the top 10 ranked twitterers are pretty much spammers!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;URL: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twellow.com/category_users/cat_id/315&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.twellow.com/category_users/cat_id/315&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitterer,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.  However, it would seem that this website simply confirms some of the difficulties I mentioned in my post.  If you take a look at the category of &#8220;pharmaceuticals,&#8221; you will find that the top 10 ranked twitterers are pretty much spammers!</p>
<p>URL: <a href="http://www.twellow.com/category_users/cat_id/315" rel="nofollow">http://www.twellow.com/category_users/cat_id/315</a></p>
<p>Best,<br />Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitterer</title>
		<link>http://thingspharma.mindgen.org/2009/12/22/twitter-sifting-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitterer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thingspharma.mindgen.org/?p=662#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Hey Rich,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For whatever it&#039;s worth, here&#039;s one directory that at least lists Twitterers by category: Twello&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;URL: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twellow.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.twellow.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps a small improvement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rich,</p>
<p>For whatever it&#39;s worth, here&#39;s one directory that at least lists Twitterers by category: Twello</p>
<p>URL: <a href="http://www.twellow.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.twellow.com/</a></p>
<p>Perhaps a small improvement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Charbonneau</title>
		<link>http://thingspharma.mindgen.org/2009/12/22/twitter-sifting-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Charbonneau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thingspharma.mindgen.org/?p=662#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Twitterer,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the comment.  However, it would seem that this website simply confirms some of the difficulties I mentioned in my post.  If you take a look at the category of &quot;pharmaceuticals,&quot; you will find that the top 10 ranked twitterers are pretty much spammers!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;URL: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twellow.com/category_users/cat_id/315&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.twellow.com/category_users/cat_id/315&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitterer,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.  However, it would seem that this website simply confirms some of the difficulties I mentioned in my post.  If you take a look at the category of &#8220;pharmaceuticals,&#8221; you will find that the top 10 ranked twitterers are pretty much spammers!</p>
<p>URL: <a href="http://www.twellow.com/category_users/cat_id/315" rel="nofollow">http://www.twellow.com/category_users/cat_id/315</a></p>
<p>Best,<br />Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitterer</title>
		<link>http://thingspharma.mindgen.org/2009/12/22/twitter-sifting-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitterer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thingspharma.mindgen.org/?p=662#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Hey Rich,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For whatever it&#039;s worth, here&#039;s one directory that at least lists Twitterers by category: Twello&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;URL: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twellow.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.twellow.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps a small improvement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rich,</p>
<p>For whatever it&#39;s worth, here&#39;s one directory that at least lists Twitterers by category: Twello</p>
<p>URL: <a href="http://www.twellow.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.twellow.com/</a></p>
<p>Perhaps a small improvement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
